recursion - Error when using Requests with python 3.5 recursively (GooglePlaces API) -


i have been having problem try send request , if there next page token in result take link , execute request recursively until there no next page token in result. first request works fine when there next page token in response , tries execute new request result invalid response if take link given result , use in postman or on browser fine. i'm assuming has requests running on different threads @ same time.

the second response request using python:

{'html_attributions': [], 'status': 'invalid_request', 'results': []}

here have:

import requests   def getplaces(location,radius,type, apikey):      url = "https://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/place/nearbysearch/json?location="+location+"&radius="+radius+"&type="+type+"&key="+apikey      print('getting results type ' + type + '...')      r = requests.get(url)      response = r.json()      results = []      if response['status'] == 'zero_results':         print("did not find results type "+type)     else:         print("results type "+type)          result in response['results']:             results.append(result)             print(result)     print('printing results')     print(results)      if 'next_page_token' in response:         print("there next page")         page_token = response['next_page_token']         print(page_token)         next_results = getnextplace(page_token,apikey)         print(next_results)         results.append(next_results)      return results      # rest of results   def getnextplace(page_token,apikey):      print('...')      next_url = 'https://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/place/nearbysearch/json?location='+location+'&radius='+radius+'&type='+type+'&pagetoken=' + page_token + '&key=' + apikey      print(next_url)     r = requests.get(next_url)     response = r.json()     results = []     print(response)      if response['status'] == 'zero_results':         print("did not find results")     elif response['status'] == 'invalid_request':         print('invalid response')     else:         next_result in response['results']:              results.append(next_result)              print(next_result)      if 'next_page_token' in response:         new_page_token = response['next_page_token']         getnext = getnextplace(new_page_token,apikey)         results.append(getnext)      return results

figured out issue! google api doesn't allow consecutive requests api if last request within ~2 seconds. did have had program sleep 3 seconds , sent request. working fine


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer
Read more

jquery - Responsive Navbar with Sub Navbar -

good day, forgive me nav vocabulary not best. if question confusing apologize. i'm working on navigation bar needs centered on page @ 768px , above. items in nav open (or perhaps toggle) subnav lives directly below. these nav should appear centered on page. i have been able work through responsive portion of nav bar, having main items align vertically , sub nav menu of each item roll out below, , gave them indent separation. working well. however, issue not responsive side, behavior @ width greater 768px. happens toggling menu's sub navigation pushes other main items down page below sub nav. here's code: $(document).ready(function () { //stick in fixed 100% height behind navbar don't wrap $('#slide-nav.navbar-inverse').after($('<div class="inverse" id="navbar-height-col"></div>')); $('#slide-nav.navbar-default').after($('<div id="navbar-height-col"></d
Read more