sql - MariaDB - GROUP BY with an order -


so have dataset, order based on strings order field(field_name, ...) after order wan't group dataset based on column.

i have tried subquery, seems ignores order by when gets subqueried.

this query group group setting_id

select * `setting_values` ((`owned_by_type` = 'app\\models\\utecca\\user' , `owned_by_id` = 1 or ((`owned_by_type` = 'app\\models\\utecca\\agreement' , `owned_by_id` = 1006))) or (`owned_by_type` = 'app\\models\\utecca\\employee' , `owned_by_id` = 1)) , `setting_values`.`deleted_at` null order field(owned_by_type, 'app\\models\\utecca\\employee', 'app\\models\\utecca\\agreement', 'app\\models\\utecca\\user')

the order works fine, cannot group based on order, selects 1 lowest primary key (id).

here attempt did not work.

select * (     select *     `setting_values`     ((`owned_by_type` = 'app\\models\\utecca\\user' , `owned_by_id` = 1 or ((`owned_by_type` = 'app\\models\\utecca\\agreement' , `owned_by_id` = 1006))) or (`owned_by_type` = 'app\\models\\utecca\\employee' , `owned_by_id` = 1)) , `setting_values`.`deleted_at` null     order field(owned_by_type, 'app\\models\\utecca\\employee', 'app\\models\\utecca\\agreement', 'app\\models\\utecca\\user') ) t group setting_id;

here sample data enter image description here

what trying accomplish sample data 1 row id 3 row.
desired result set query should obey these rules

  • 1 row each setting_id
  • owned_by_type owned_by_id filtered following way agreement = 1006, user = 1, employee = 1.
  • when limiting 1 row each setting_idit should done following priority in owned_by_type column employee, agreement, user

here sqlfiddle it.

running mariadb version 10.2.6-mariadb

first of all, optimizer free ignore inner order by. so, please describe further intent is.

getting past that, can use subquery:

select ...     ( select             ...             group ...             order ...  -- lost unless followed :             limit 9999999999  -- valid; or high (for all)          ) x     group ...

perhaps doing groupwise max ??


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj...
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer ...
Read more

c# - Asp.net web api : redirect unauthorized requst to forbidden page -

im trying redirect unauthorized request forbidden page instead i'm getting forbidden page in response body , how can fix ? here's startup class : app.createperowincontext(storecontext.create); app.createperowincontext<applicationusermanager>(applicationusermanager.create); app.createperowincontext<applicationsigninmanager>(applicationsigninmanager.create); app.usecookieauthentication(new cookieauthenticationoptions { authenticationtype = defaultauthenticationtypes.applicationcookie, expiretimespan = timespan.fromdays(30), }); app.useexternalsignincookie(defaultauthenticationtypes.externalcookie); app.usetwofactorsignincookie(defaultauthenticationtypes.twofactorcookie, timespan.fromminutes(5)); app.usetwofactorrememberbrowsercookie(defaultauthenticationtypes.twofactorrememberbrowsercookie); the method im trying reach : [httpget] [authorize(roles = "admin")] public string getcurrentusername() { return userman...
Read more