c# - SMO to Azure SQL using multiple threads -


i have multithreaded service, uses smo read table , column names , may alter database. looking azure , proceeded try code there. has been working sql server long time. in azure sql, when using 1 thread, works fine. when 2nd thread starts reading while 1st thread still executing, exception thrown:

   system.invalidoperationexception: there open datareader associated command must closed first.    @ system.data.sqlclient.sqlinternalconnectiontds.validateconnectionforexecute(sqlcommand command)    @ system.data.sqlclient.sqlcommand.validatecommand(string method, boolean async)    @ system.data.sqlclient.sqlcommand.runexecutereader(commandbehavior cmdbehavior, runbehavior runbehavior, boolean returnstream, string method, taskcompletionsource`1 completion, int32 timeout, task& task, boolean& usedcache, boolean asyncwrite, boolean inretry)    @ system.data.sqlclient.sqlcommand.runexecutereader(commandbehavior cmdbehavior, runbehavior runbehavior, boolean returnstream, string method)    @ system.data.sqlclient.sqlcommand.executereader(commandbehavior behavior, string method)    @ system.data.sqlclient.sqlcommand.executereader()    @ microsoft.sqlserver.management.common.connectionmanager.executetsql(executetsqlaction action, object execobject, dataset filldataset, boolean catchexception)    @ microsoft.sqlserver.management.common.serverconnection.getexecutereader(sqlcommand command)    @ microsoft.sqlserver.management.smo.executesql.getdatareader(string query, sqlcommand& command)    @ microsoft.sqlserver.management.smo.dataprovider.setconnectionandquery(executesql execsql, string query)    @ microsoft.sqlserver.management.smo.executesql.getdataprovider(stringcollection query, object con, statementbuilder sb, retrivemode rm)    @ microsoft.sqlserver.management.smo.sqlobjectbase.filldata(resulttype resulttype, stringcollection sql, object connectioninfo, statementbuilder sb)    @ microsoft.sqlserver.management.smo.sqlobjectbase.filldatawithusefailure(sqlenumresult sqlresult, resulttype resulttype)    @ microsoft.sqlserver.management.smo.sqlobjectbase.buildresult(enumresult result)    @ microsoft.sqlserver.management.sdk.sfc.environment.getdata()    @ microsoft.sqlserver.management.sdk.sfc.environment.getdata(request req, object ci)    @ microsoft.sqlserver.management.sdk.sfc.enumerator.getdata(object connectioninfo, request request)    @ microsoft.sqlserver.management.smo.executionmanager.getenumeratordatareader(request req)    @ microsoft.sqlserver.management.smo.sqlsmoobject.getinitdatareader(string[] fields, orderby[] orderby)    @ microsoft.sqlserver.management.smo.sqlsmoobject.implinitialize(string[] fields, orderby[] orderby)    @ microsoft.sqlserver.management.smo.sqlsmoobject.initialize(boolean allproperties)    @ microsoft.sqlserver.management.smo.smocollectionbase.initializechildobject(objectkeybase key)    @ microsoft.sqlserver.management.smo.smocollectionbase.getobjectbykey(objectkeybase key)    @ microsoft.sqlserver.management.smo.tablecollection.get_item(string name)

fierce googling has not produced feasible, using smo should fine, if not share between threads. updated new official smo 2017 nuget package microsoft, did not help. after 1st thread finished, second operates fine 1 thread can reading database. appreciated.

the code use read db follows:

  private database getdatabase()     {         //do not have db every time on same thread.         if (_db != null) return _db;         //getconnection returns new sqlconnection         using (var conn = _executor.getconnection() sqlconnection)         {             conn.open();             var sconn = new serverconnection(conn);             var server = new server(sconn);             _db = server.databases[sconn.databasename];             _db.defaultschema = "dbo";              //problem azure:             //enumerate these ensure immediate crash, when 2nd thread kicks in             //and 1st thread still executing.             //works fine sql server             foreach (table t in _db.tables)             {                 foreach (column c in t.columns)                 {                  }             }         }         return _db;     }


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj...
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer ...
Read more

c# - Asp.net web api : redirect unauthorized requst to forbidden page -

im trying redirect unauthorized request forbidden page instead i'm getting forbidden page in response body , how can fix ? here's startup class : app.createperowincontext(storecontext.create); app.createperowincontext<applicationusermanager>(applicationusermanager.create); app.createperowincontext<applicationsigninmanager>(applicationsigninmanager.create); app.usecookieauthentication(new cookieauthenticationoptions { authenticationtype = defaultauthenticationtypes.applicationcookie, expiretimespan = timespan.fromdays(30), }); app.useexternalsignincookie(defaultauthenticationtypes.externalcookie); app.usetwofactorsignincookie(defaultauthenticationtypes.twofactorcookie, timespan.fromminutes(5)); app.usetwofactorrememberbrowsercookie(defaultauthenticationtypes.twofactorrememberbrowsercookie); the method im trying reach : [httpget] [authorize(roles = "admin")] public string getcurrentusername() { return userman...
Read more