python - Nicer way to represent call differences in mocks, in pytest (or in general?) -


i'm having issue i'm using mock library in python (2.7), , see errors this:

    def raise_from(value, from_value): >       raise value e       assertionerror: expected call: run_sync(country_code='gb', email_data={'username': 'username-1n@n3m((', 'hotelier_name': 'alexander qw*!@h#(!*@#', 'id': 'hotel-id-8nabqtqw', 'hotelier_email': 'alexander@rnwmenrqnweq#!@#.com', 'name': 'hotel-name-8nabqtqw'}, i18n_labels=<magicmock name='elami_labels' id='140095030265936'>, mail_service=<magicmock name='mock.mail_service.users().messages()' id='140095028784272'>, partner_id='partner-facebooking-@j344', partner_name='partner-name-anqwwenn', product=<product object @ 0x7f6a6ad1da50>, username='username-1n@n3m((') e       actual call: run_sync(country_code='gb', email_data={'username': 'username-1n@n3m((', 'hotelier_name': 'alexander qw*!@h#(!*@#', 'id': 'hotel-id-8nabqtqw', 'hotelier_email': 'alexander@rnwmenrqnweq#!@#.com', 'name': 'hotel-name-8nabqtqw'}, i18n_labels=<magicmock name='elami_labels' id='140095030265936'>, mailing_service=<magicmock name='mock.mail_service.users().messages()' id='140095028784272'>, partner_id='partner-facebooking-@j344', partner_name='partner-name-anqwwenn', product=<product object @ 0x7f6a6ad1da50>, username='username-1n@n3m((')

this looks ok here, because of scrolling, looks lot worse in console. this:

e assertionerror: expected call: run_sync(country_code='gb', email_data={'username': 'username-1n@n3m((', 'hotelier_name': 'alexander qw*!@h#(!*@#', 'id': 'hotel-id-8nabqtqw', 'hotelier_email': 'alexander@rnwmenrqnweq#!@#.com', 'name': 'hotel-name-8nabqtqw'}, i18n_labels=, mail_service=, partner_id='partner-facebooking-@j344', partner_name='partner-name-anqwwenn', product=, username='username-1n@n3m((')

e actual call: run_sync(country_code='gb', email_data={'username': 'username-1n@n3m((', 'hotelier_name': 'alexander qw*!@h#(!*@#', 'id': 'hotel-id-8nabqtqw', 'hotelier_email': 'alexander@rnwmenrqnweq#!@#.com', 'name': 'hotel-name-8nabqtqw'}, i18n_labels=, mailing_service=, partner_id='partner-facebooking-@j344', partner_name='partner-name-anqwwenn', product=, username='username-1n@n3m((')

even so, because 2 lines not aligned, it's hard spot differences.

is there tool can fix this? i'm not @ pytest extensions, if there none, should write 1 - if that's possible. i'm sure lot of people have problem time.

or perhaps there's way, independent of py.test show such difference... quick way parse calls , have show our error.

give pytest-sugar try:

a plugin py.test changes default , feel of py.test (e.g. progressbar, show tests fail instantly)

seems step forward in having prettier output pytest.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer
Read more

jquery - Responsive Navbar with Sub Navbar -

good day, forgive me nav vocabulary not best. if question confusing apologize. i'm working on navigation bar needs centered on page @ 768px , above. items in nav open (or perhaps toggle) subnav lives directly below. these nav should appear centered on page. i have been able work through responsive portion of nav bar, having main items align vertically , sub nav menu of each item roll out below, , gave them indent separation. working well. however, issue not responsive side, behavior @ width greater 768px. happens toggling menu's sub navigation pushes other main items down page below sub nav. here's code: $(document).ready(function () { //stick in fixed 100% height behind navbar don't wrap $('#slide-nav.navbar-inverse').after($('<div class="inverse" id="navbar-height-col"></div>')); $('#slide-nav.navbar-default').after($('<div id="navbar-height-col"></d
Read more