sql server - How to perform "Order by" on an encrypted column (deterministic encryption - SQL 2016) -


how perform "order by" on encrypted column (deterministic encryption - sql server 2016) ?

i getting error when executed on ssms 2017 (with required settings ae)

select *  [dbo].[x]  order lastname

the lastname column defined this:

[lastname] [varchar](60) collate latin1_general_bin2 encrypted (column_encryption_key = [x]

i error:

msg 33299, level 16, state 2, line 9
encryption scheme mismatch columns/variables 'lastname'. encryption scheme columns/variables (encryption_type = 'deterministic', encryption_algorithm_name = 'aead_aes_256_cbc_hmac_sha_256', column_encryption_key_name = 'x', column_encryption_key_database_name = 'x') , expression near line '3' expects (encryption_type = 'plaintext') (or weaker).

order not supported on encrypted columns.

more details can found on this article

the database engine never operates on plaintext data stored in encrypted columns, still supports queries on encrypted data, depending on encryption type column. encrypted supports 2 types of encryption: randomized encryption , deterministic encryption.

deterministic encryption generates same encrypted value given plain text value. using deterministic encryption allows point lookups, equality joins, grouping , indexing on encrypted columns. however, may allow unauthorized users guess information encrypted values examining patterns in encrypted column, if there small set of possible encrypted values, such true/false, or north/south/east/west region. deterministic encryption must use column collation binary2 sort order character columns.

randomized encryption uses method encrypts data in less predictable manner. randomized encryption more secure, prevents searching, grouping, indexing, , joining on encrypted columns. use deterministic encryption columns used search or grouping parameters, example government id number. use randomized encryption, data such confidential investigation comments, not grouped other records , not used join tables. details on encrypted cryptographic algorithms, see encrypted cryptography.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer
Read more

jquery - Responsive Navbar with Sub Navbar -

good day, forgive me nav vocabulary not best. if question confusing apologize. i'm working on navigation bar needs centered on page @ 768px , above. items in nav open (or perhaps toggle) subnav lives directly below. these nav should appear centered on page. i have been able work through responsive portion of nav bar, having main items align vertically , sub nav menu of each item roll out below, , gave them indent separation. working well. however, issue not responsive side, behavior @ width greater 768px. happens toggling menu's sub navigation pushes other main items down page below sub nav. here's code: $(document).ready(function () { //stick in fixed 100% height behind navbar don't wrap $('#slide-nav.navbar-inverse').after($('<div class="inverse" id="navbar-height-col"></div>')); $('#slide-nav.navbar-default').after($('<div id="navbar-height-col"></d
Read more