CancellationToken doesn't get triggered in the Azure Functions -


i've got simple azure function:

public static class mycounter {     public static int _timerround = 0;     public static bool _isfirst = true;      [functionname("counter")]     //[timeoutattribute("00:00:05")]     public async static task run([timertrigger("*/10 * * * * *")]timerinfo mytimer, tracewriter log, cancellationtoken token)     {         try         {             log.info($"c# timer trigger function executed at: {datetime.utcnow}");             if (_isfirst)             {                 log.info("cancellation token registered");                 token.register(async () =>                 {                     log.info("cancellation token requested");                     return;                 });                 _isfirst = false;             }             interlocked.increment(ref _timerround);             (int = 0; < 10; i++)             {                 log.info($"round: {_timerround}, step: {i}, cancel request:{token.iscancellationrequested}");                 await task.delay(500, token).configureawait(false);             }         }         catch (exception ex)         {             log.error("hold on, exception!", ex);         }     } }

what i'm trying capturing cancellationtoken request event when app stops or code redeploy happened (host shutdown event).

btw, i've tried check iscancellationrequested property in loop well. never turns true.

the main requirement not loose operation/data during function deployments, want know app being stopped persist data processed once host started again after update.

based on code, tested on side, here test result:

enter image description here

enter image description here

from above screenshots, find subsequent rounds not handle cancellation callback except first round. fabio cavalcante commented, removed _isfirst logical checking , found work rounds follows:

enter image description here

note: simulated shutdown of host disabling function when timertrigger triggered.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer
Read more

jquery - Responsive Navbar with Sub Navbar -

good day, forgive me nav vocabulary not best. if question confusing apologize. i'm working on navigation bar needs centered on page @ 768px , above. items in nav open (or perhaps toggle) subnav lives directly below. these nav should appear centered on page. i have been able work through responsive portion of nav bar, having main items align vertically , sub nav menu of each item roll out below, , gave them indent separation. working well. however, issue not responsive side, behavior @ width greater 768px. happens toggling menu's sub navigation pushes other main items down page below sub nav. here's code: $(document).ready(function () { //stick in fixed 100% height behind navbar don't wrap $('#slide-nav.navbar-inverse').after($('<div class="inverse" id="navbar-height-col"></div>')); $('#slide-nav.navbar-default').after($('<div id="navbar-height-col"></d
Read more