apache spark sql - SparkSQL : same query returns different result -


i encountered weird problem. wanted data dataframe , insert permanent hive table , index elasticsearch.query simple select * result* , loop through each row , insert es. , simple insert <hive_table> select * result, got different result. check created 3 different temprorary table this

spark.sql("select * qtycontribution").join(getrevenuecontribution(spark,table2), "item").join(finaluniqueitem(spark), "item").registertemptable("hola"); spark.sql("select * qtycontribution").join(getrevenuecontribution(spark,table2), "item").join(finaluniqueitem(spark), "item").registertemptable("hola1"); spark.sql("select * qtycontribution").join(getrevenuecontribution(spark,table2), "item").join(finaluniqueitem(spark), "item").registertemptable("hola2");

each query same tables different. , 

dataset<row> dframe1 = spark.sql("select * hola");         row[] row1 = (row[]) dframe1.collect();         int q=1;         for(row s : row1){             system.out.println(s.get(0)+" =======df1======= "+ q++);          }  dataset<row> dframe2 = spark.sql("select * hola1");         row[] row2 = (row[]) dframe2.collect();         int w=1;         for(row s : row2){             system.out.println(s.get(0)+" =======df2======= "+ w++);          }  dataset<row> dframe3 = spark.sql("select * hola2");         row[] row3 = (row[]) dframe3.collect();         int e=1;         for(row s : row2){             system.out.println(s.get(0)+" =======df3======= "+ e++);          }

and result this

bm8942 =======df1======= 1723 bm8942 =======df2======= 1733 bm8942 =======df3======= 1733

and es did

dataset<row> dframe = spark.sql("select * hola1");         row[] row = (row[]) dframe.collect();         int = 1;         (row r : row) {         bulkrequest.add(client.prepareindex("twitter1234", "use1", string.valueof(i))                 .setsource(jsonbuilder()                         .startobject()                         .field("item", r.get(0))                         .field("qty_contrib", r.get(1))                         .field("division", r.get(2))                         .field("rev_contrib", r.get(3))                         .field("bp", r.get(4))                         .endobject()                 )         );             system.out.println(i++ +" ==== "+r.get(0));         }

and got

1534 ==== bm8942

what's happening ?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer
Read more

jquery - Responsive Navbar with Sub Navbar -

good day, forgive me nav vocabulary not best. if question confusing apologize. i'm working on navigation bar needs centered on page @ 768px , above. items in nav open (or perhaps toggle) subnav lives directly below. these nav should appear centered on page. i have been able work through responsive portion of nav bar, having main items align vertically , sub nav menu of each item roll out below, , gave them indent separation. working well. however, issue not responsive side, behavior @ width greater 768px. happens toggling menu's sub navigation pushes other main items down page below sub nav. here's code: $(document).ready(function () { //stick in fixed 100% height behind navbar don't wrap $('#slide-nav.navbar-inverse').after($('<div class="inverse" id="navbar-height-col"></div>')); $('#slide-nav.navbar-default').after($('<div id="navbar-height-col"></d
Read more