css - webkit-filter changing z-index stacking order -


why applying webkit filter changes layers order?

see minimal example:

setinterval(function(){    	t.classlist.toggle('grayed');        }, 1000)
.floater {      position: fixed;      top: 5vh;      left: 5vw;      width: 90vw;      height: 90vh;      z-index: 99;      background: yellow;      display: none;  }  td:hover .floater{      display: initial;  }    .grayed td{      -webkit-filter: grayscale(0.5);  }    td{      padding: 1em;      text-align: center;      background: blue;  }
<table id="t">      <tr>          <td>1</td>          <td>2</td>          <td>3</td>      </tr>      <tr>          <td>4</td>          <td>5<br>              (mouse on this)              <div class="floater">hello</div>          </td>          <td>6</td>      </tr>      <tr>          <td>7</td>          <td>8</td>          <td>9</td>      </tr>  </table>

  • child's z-index set same stacking index parent, hence why it's not working.
  • if willing take floater out of it's table parent, try below js approach mouseover & mouseout (to close).

setinterval(function() {    t.classlist.toggle('grayed');    document.queryselector('.floater').classlist.toggle('grayed');  }, 1000)    document.queryselector('.tohover').addeventlistener('mouseover', function() {    document.queryselector('.floater').classlist.add('open');  })  document.queryselector('.floater').addeventlistener('mouseout', function() {    document.queryselector('.floater').classlist.remove('open');  })
.floater {    position: fixed;    top: 5vh;    left: 5vw;    width: 90vw;    height: 90vh;    z-index: 1;    background: yellow;    display: none;  }    .grayed td {    -webkit-filter: grayscale(0.5);  }    .grayed {    -webkit-filter: grayscale(0.5);  }    .open {    display: initial;  }    td {    padding: 1em;    text-align: center;    background: blue;  }
<table id="t">    <tr>      <td>1</td>      <td>2</td>      <td>3</td>    </tr>    <tr>      <td>4</td>      <td class="tohover">5<br> (mouse on this)        <div>hello</div>      </td>      <td>6</td>    </tr>    <tr>      <td>7</td>      <td>8</td>      <td>9</td>    </tr>  </table>    <div class="floater">hello</div>


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer
Read more

jquery - Responsive Navbar with Sub Navbar -

good day, forgive me nav vocabulary not best. if question confusing apologize. i'm working on navigation bar needs centered on page @ 768px , above. items in nav open (or perhaps toggle) subnav lives directly below. these nav should appear centered on page. i have been able work through responsive portion of nav bar, having main items align vertically , sub nav menu of each item roll out below, , gave them indent separation. working well. however, issue not responsive side, behavior @ width greater 768px. happens toggling menu's sub navigation pushes other main items down page below sub nav. here's code: $(document).ready(function () { //stick in fixed 100% height behind navbar don't wrap $('#slide-nav.navbar-inverse').after($('<div class="inverse" id="navbar-height-col"></div>')); $('#slide-nav.navbar-default').after($('<div id="navbar-height-col"></d
Read more