java - More connections than thread handlers -


say have 2 endpoints in api (in spring previously):

@requestmapping("/async") public completablefuture<string> g(){     completablefuture<string> f = new completablefuture<>();     f.runasync(() -> {         try {             thread.sleep(5000);             f.complete("finished");         } catch (interruptedexception e) {             e.printstacktrace();         }     });     thread.sleep(1000);     return f; }  @requestmapping("/sync") public string h() throws interruptedexception {     thread.sleep(5000);     thread.sleep(1000);     return "finished"; }

when send 2 requests (just single requests) to:

localhost:8080/async --> response in 5024ms

localhost:8080/sync --> response in '6055ms`

this makes sense because sending single request. things interesting when load test siege involving 255 concurrent users.

in case, async api endpoint isn't able handle many connections.

so async not scalable.

does depend on hardware? had hardware able handle more thread-handlers, heavy hardware, async 1 able handle more transactions since there more threads?

you're still using forkjoinpool.commonpool() async invocations. told it's small , filled up. try (i fixed completablefuture code too, it's totally wrong, doesn't show in example).

completablefuture<void> f = completablefuture.runasync(() -> {         try {             thread.sleep(5000);         } catch (interruptedexception e) {             e.printstacktrace();         }     }, executors.newsinglethreadexecutor()); return f;

now each async call gets own executor, doesn't choke on common pool. of course since async calls own executor, bad example. you'd want use shared pool, larger common pool.

it has nothing (well, little) hardware. has long running operations intermingled short running operations.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj...
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer ...
Read more

c# - Asp.net web api : redirect unauthorized requst to forbidden page -

im trying redirect unauthorized request forbidden page instead i'm getting forbidden page in response body , how can fix ? here's startup class : app.createperowincontext(storecontext.create); app.createperowincontext<applicationusermanager>(applicationusermanager.create); app.createperowincontext<applicationsigninmanager>(applicationsigninmanager.create); app.usecookieauthentication(new cookieauthenticationoptions { authenticationtype = defaultauthenticationtypes.applicationcookie, expiretimespan = timespan.fromdays(30), }); app.useexternalsignincookie(defaultauthenticationtypes.externalcookie); app.usetwofactorsignincookie(defaultauthenticationtypes.twofactorcookie, timespan.fromminutes(5)); app.usetwofactorrememberbrowsercookie(defaultauthenticationtypes.twofactorrememberbrowsercookie); the method im trying reach : [httpget] [authorize(roles = "admin")] public string getcurrentusername() { return userman...
Read more