php - Adding array elements with a for(reach) loop -


(first bit/lot of context @ bottom question)

i writing api returns planning amongst other things. response in json , should followed:

"planning":   [   {     "name": "overview",     "dates":       [       {         "date": "yyyy-mm-dd",         "division1": "type",         "division2": "type"       },       {         "date": "yyyy-mm-dd",         "division1": "type",         "division2": "type"       },       ...       ]   },   {     "name": "division1",     "dates":       [       {         "date": "yyyy-mm-dd",         "type": "type",         "description": "type"       },       ...       ]   },   ...

there standard blok "name": "overview" returned, , each division requester part of, block "name":"divisionname" added response.

the issue have amount or names of divisions aren't set in stone. there can more or less depending on deployment. cover wrote following code:

<?php     ...     $stmt = $conn->prepare("select `iddivision` division;");     $stmt->execute();     $stmt->bind_result($iddivision);     while($stmt->fetch()){         $divisions[] = $iddivision;         $$iddivision = array();     }     ... ?>

this should create array each division array name being id of division (correct?).

then planning data db store in multiple arrays later use response building:

<?php $stmt->bind_result($type, $date, $iddivision, $day, $description, $note); while($stmt->fetch()){     if(checkarray($date, $arr_date) != true){         array_push($arr_date, $date);         array_push($arr_day, $day);     }     array_push($$iddivision, $type); //this should push correct array. } ?>

at end want combine respons ofcourse (this lost):

<?php for($i = 0; $i <= count($arr_date); $i++){     $planning[0]['dates'][] = array(         "date" => $arr_date[$i],             // how add every division "arrayname" => "$type" here?         ); } ?>

as in comment above, don't know how add key:value each division found dynamically becomes:

<?php for($i = 0; $i <= count($arr_date); $i++){     $planning[0]['dates'][] = array(         "date" => $arr_date[$i],         "division1" => $value,         "division2" => $value,         "division3" => $value,                     // , on every division         ); } ?>

is there way or should go doing different way? feel should/could use $divisions array.

try out this. 

for($i = 0; $i <= count($arr_date); $i++){     $planning[0]['dates'][$i]["date"] = $arr_date[$i];       for($j=0;$j<count($division);$j++){        $planning[0]['dates'][$i]["division$j"] = $division[$j];   } } ?>

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer
Read more

jquery - Responsive Navbar with Sub Navbar -

good day, forgive me nav vocabulary not best. if question confusing apologize. i'm working on navigation bar needs centered on page @ 768px , above. items in nav open (or perhaps toggle) subnav lives directly below. these nav should appear centered on page. i have been able work through responsive portion of nav bar, having main items align vertically , sub nav menu of each item roll out below, , gave them indent separation. working well. however, issue not responsive side, behavior @ width greater 768px. happens toggling menu's sub navigation pushes other main items down page below sub nav. here's code: $(document).ready(function () { //stick in fixed 100% height behind navbar don't wrap $('#slide-nav.navbar-inverse').after($('<div class="inverse" id="navbar-height-col"></div>')); $('#slide-nav.navbar-default').after($('<div id="navbar-height-col"></d
Read more