javascript - return Object.keys in a map got undefined -


what's wrong loop below? want calculate total_count , return [total, total] after manipulation within map, got undefined.

my raw data

const raw = [{   "device_info": {     "name": "cam1",   },   "age_range": {     "0-10": {       "age_range": "0-10",       "total_count": 15,       "male_count": 6,       "female_count": 9     },     "11-20": {       "age_range": "11-20",       "total_count": 11,       "male_count": 7,       "female_count": 4     },     "21-30": {       "age_range": "21-30",       "total_count": 922,       "male_count": 452,       "female_count": 470     }   } }, {   "device_info": {     "name": "cam2",   },   "age_range": {     "0-10": {       "age_range": "0-10",       "total_count": 1,       "male_count": 1,       "female_count": 0     },     "11-20": {       "age_range": "11-20",       "total_count": 2,       "male_count": 0,       "female_count": 2     },     "21-30": {       "age_range": "21-30",       "total_count": 90,       "male_count": 58,       "female_count": 32     }   } }]

loop

const x = raw.map(obj => {   return object.keys(obj).foreach(key => {     let total = 0     if (key === 'age_range') {       total = object.keys(obj.age_range).reduce((acum, innerkey) => {         return acum + obj.age_range[innerkey].total_count       }, 0)       console.log(total)     }   }); })  console.log('x', x)

https://jsfiddle.net/19m3f7fs/1

array#foreach doesn't return anything, use array#map , object.values instead:

const x = raw.map(obj => {   return object.values(obj.age_range).reduce((acc, item) => acc + item.total_count, 0) })

working example:

const raw = [{    "device_info": {      "name": "cam1",    },    "age_range": {      "0-10": {        "age_range": "0-10",        "total_count": 15,        "male_count": 6,        "female_count": 9      },      "11-20": {        "age_range": "11-20",        "total_count": 11,        "male_count": 7,        "female_count": 4      },      "21-30": {        "age_range": "21-30",        "total_count": 922,        "male_count": 452,        "female_count": 470      }    }  }, {    "device_info": {      "name": "cam2",    },    "age_range": {      "0-10": {        "age_range": "0-10",        "total_count": 1,        "male_count": 1,        "female_count": 0      },      "11-20": {        "age_range": "11-20",        "total_count": 2,        "male_count": 0,        "female_count": 2      },      "21-30": {        "age_range": "21-30",        "total_count": 90,        "male_count": 58,        "female_count": 32      }    }  }]    const x = raw.map(obj => object.values(obj.age_range).reduce((acc, item) => acc + item.total_count, 0))    console.log(x)


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer
Read more

jquery - Responsive Navbar with Sub Navbar -

good day, forgive me nav vocabulary not best. if question confusing apologize. i'm working on navigation bar needs centered on page @ 768px , above. items in nav open (or perhaps toggle) subnav lives directly below. these nav should appear centered on page. i have been able work through responsive portion of nav bar, having main items align vertically , sub nav menu of each item roll out below, , gave them indent separation. working well. however, issue not responsive side, behavior @ width greater 768px. happens toggling menu's sub navigation pushes other main items down page below sub nav. here's code: $(document).ready(function () { //stick in fixed 100% height behind navbar don't wrap $('#slide-nav.navbar-inverse').after($('<div class="inverse" id="navbar-height-col"></div>')); $('#slide-nav.navbar-default').after($('<div id="navbar-height-col"></d
Read more