nginx - uwsgi in docker in vagrant in vmware - socket not being created -


on mac running windows server 2016 in vmware. in there running ubuntu in vagrant/virtual box. in there trying run django app in docker container nginx/uwsgi.

uwsgi failing start with:

[uwsgi] getting ini configuration /opt/django/capgraph/uwsgi.ini *** starting uwsgi 2.0.15 (64bit) on [thu aug 17 20:01:23 2017] *** compiled version: 6.4.0 20170805 on 17 august 2017 06:10:50 os: linux-3.13.0-128-generic #177-ubuntu smp tue aug 8 11:40:23 utc 2017 nodename: 37db4344b5ae machine: x86_64 clock source: unix pcre jit disabled detected number of cpu cores: 1 current working directory: / detected binary path: /usr/local/bin/uwsgi uwsgi running root, can use --uid/--gid/--chroot options *** warning: running uwsgi root !!! (use --uid flag) *** chdir() /opt/django/capgraph/ memory page size 4096 bytes detected max file descriptor number: 524288 lock engine: pthread robust mutexes thunder lock: disabled (you can enable --thunder-lock) bind(): operation not permitted [core/socket.c line 230]

in vmware folder set sharing write permission. mounted in vagrant vm 777, , in docker container 777. can create files in dir 3 places. seems uwsgi cannot create socket.

i tried short python script test vagrant , not create socket either:

vagrant@vagrant-ubuntu-trusty-64:/vagrant$ python -c "import socket s; sock = s.socket(s.af_unix); sock.bind('/vagrant/app.sock')" traceback (most recent call last):   file "<string>", line 1, in <module>   file "/usr/lib/python2.7/socket.py", line 224, in meth     return getattr(self._sock,name)(*args) socket.error: [errno 1] operation not permitted

anyone know how can resolve this?

update: changed dir /tmp can create socket python script, still uwsgi fails same error.

update 2: created socket in /tmp python script, chmod-ed 777 , still same error uwsgi.

use other folder other /vagrant. use /home/vagrant

the problem /vagrant not same normal folder. if execute command mount | grep vagrant find uses vboxfs file system, reason doesn't gel docker


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer
Read more

jquery - Responsive Navbar with Sub Navbar -

good day, forgive me nav vocabulary not best. if question confusing apologize. i'm working on navigation bar needs centered on page @ 768px , above. items in nav open (or perhaps toggle) subnav lives directly below. these nav should appear centered on page. i have been able work through responsive portion of nav bar, having main items align vertically , sub nav menu of each item roll out below, , gave them indent separation. working well. however, issue not responsive side, behavior @ width greater 768px. happens toggling menu's sub navigation pushes other main items down page below sub nav. here's code: $(document).ready(function () { //stick in fixed 100% height behind navbar don't wrap $('#slide-nav.navbar-inverse').after($('<div class="inverse" id="navbar-height-col"></div>')); $('#slide-nav.navbar-default').after($('<div id="navbar-height-col"></d
Read more