c# - Should I hide DTOs and View Models behind interfaces or abstractions? -


in there value in using ioc resolvable interfaces specify dtos?

fer example:

private readonly igettransactionsquery _query; private readonly icreatetransactioncommand _createcommand;  public transactionscontroller(     igettransactionsquery query,     icreatetransactioncommand createcommand) {     _query = query;     _createcommand = createcommand; }  [enablequery] public iqueryable<itransactionquerymodel> get() {     return _query.execute(); }  public async task<ihttpactionresult> post(icreatetransactionmodel transaction) {     if (!modelstate.isvalid)     {         return badrequest(modelstate);     }     await _createcommand.execute(transaction);     return created(transaction); }

here, using itransactionquerymodel , icreatetransactionmodel, instead of concretions. there business value here? scenarios can benefit approach? can think of few, wanted consensus of use case scenarios

note: referring controller "action" methods, not constructor, benefit of having ioc obvious

there 2 common reasons use interfaces:

  1. as abstraction hide behavior.
  2. to allow set of types expose same data members, used if same type.

abstractions allow intercept, mock or replace behavior without having change consumers of these types. needed if such type contains behavior needs extended or replaced.

in case of dtos, unlikely have behavior needs abstracted. matter of fact, objects should not have of such behavior. makes unreasonable hide dto behind abstraction reason.

your application might have data objects have things in common. instance, might decide entities in application should have id property. can define ientity interface or entity base type contains id. allows define methods operate on base type or interface, instead of having specify them on , on again each of entities in system.

in case of dtos however, unlikely have other dtos have same set of properties. name itransactionquerymodel implies, set of data defines 'transaction query model'. in other words, have one-to-one mapping between itransactionquerymodel abstraction , implementation. useless.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer
Read more

jquery - Responsive Navbar with Sub Navbar -

good day, forgive me nav vocabulary not best. if question confusing apologize. i'm working on navigation bar needs centered on page @ 768px , above. items in nav open (or perhaps toggle) subnav lives directly below. these nav should appear centered on page. i have been able work through responsive portion of nav bar, having main items align vertically , sub nav menu of each item roll out below, , gave them indent separation. working well. however, issue not responsive side, behavior @ width greater 768px. happens toggling menu's sub navigation pushes other main items down page below sub nav. here's code: $(document).ready(function () { //stick in fixed 100% height behind navbar don't wrap $('#slide-nav.navbar-inverse').after($('<div class="inverse" id="navbar-height-col"></div>')); $('#slide-nav.navbar-default').after($('<div id="navbar-height-col"></d
Read more