SQL Server database redesign ideas -


i have table contains list of menu items. menu item table related 5 other tables menu content table, menu download table. right got new requirement add 1 more layer saying each menu can associated multiple technical codes. looking optimized db restructuring without affecting existing data.

menu table:

menuid menuname ---------------- 1       menu1 2       menu2

menu content table:

menucontentid menuid menucontent --------------------------------- 1              1      contentsss 2              2       content2

now need add new relation techcode. each menuname can have 2 versions. application in production. thinking optimized way redesign database , application.

first approach adding code , adding tech_code menuitem table , group based on code.

menuid code menuname  tech_code ------------------------------- 1       m   menu1      2       m   menu2      b 3         menu3       menucontentid menuid  menucontent --------------------------------- 1              1      contentsss 2              2      content2

2nd option create parent table , when query data query using parent table id

parentmenuid menuid  ------------------- 1                1 1                2  menuid parentmenuid  menuname  tech_code ----------------------------------------   1       m          menu1          2       m          menu2        b   3                menu3

3rd design (add tech_code referencing tables)

menuid  menuname ----------------- 1       menu1 2       menu2  menucontentid menuid   menucontent  tech_code ---------------------------------------------- 1              1       contentsss      2              2       content2        b

which best way implement this? please give me suggestions.

here can specify code type: tech code or menu code or .... etc

each menu has code + content

and if want menu have 2 types of codes @ same time, can have 2 tables codelist "menucodelist" , "techcodelist" , remove codelist , add ids menu_code_content , no need codetype if needed "menucodelist" , "techcodelist" tables alone

enter image description here


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj...
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer ...
Read more

c# - Asp.net web api : redirect unauthorized requst to forbidden page -

im trying redirect unauthorized request forbidden page instead i'm getting forbidden page in response body , how can fix ? here's startup class : app.createperowincontext(storecontext.create); app.createperowincontext<applicationusermanager>(applicationusermanager.create); app.createperowincontext<applicationsigninmanager>(applicationsigninmanager.create); app.usecookieauthentication(new cookieauthenticationoptions { authenticationtype = defaultauthenticationtypes.applicationcookie, expiretimespan = timespan.fromdays(30), }); app.useexternalsignincookie(defaultauthenticationtypes.externalcookie); app.usetwofactorsignincookie(defaultauthenticationtypes.twofactorcookie, timespan.fromminutes(5)); app.usetwofactorrememberbrowsercookie(defaultauthenticationtypes.twofactorrememberbrowsercookie); the method im trying reach : [httpget] [authorize(roles = "admin")] public string getcurrentusername() { return userman...
Read more