apache spark - Why does Complete output mode require aggregation? -


i work latest structured streaming in apache spark 2.2 , got following exception:

org.apache.spark.sql.analysisexception: complete output mode not supported when there no streaming aggregations on streaming dataframes/datasets;;

why complete output mode require streaming aggregation? happen if spark allowed complete output mode no aggregations in streaming query?

scala> spark.version res0: string = 2.2.0  import org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.memorystream import org.apache.spark.sql.sqlcontext implicit val sqlcontext: sqlcontext = spark.sqlcontext val source = memorystream[(int, int)] val ids = source.tods.todf("time", "id").   withcolumn("time", $"time" cast "timestamp"). // <-- convert time column int timestamp   dropduplicates("id").   withcolumn("time", $"time" cast "long")  // <-- convert time column timestamp int  import org.apache.spark.sql.streaming.{outputmode, trigger} import scala.concurrent.duration._ scala> val q = ids.      |   writestream.      |   format("memory").      |   queryname("dups").      |   outputmode(outputmode.complete).  // <-- memory sink supports checkpointing complete output mode      |   trigger(trigger.processingtime(30.seconds)).      |   option("checkpointlocation", "checkpoint-dir"). // <-- use checkpointing save state between restarts      |   start org.apache.spark.sql.analysisexception: complete output mode not supported when there no streaming aggregations on streaming dataframes/datasets;; project [cast(time#10 bigint) time#15l, id#6] +- deduplicate [id#6], true    +- project [cast(time#5 timestamp) time#10, id#6]       +- project [_1#2 time#5, _2#3 id#6]          +- streamingexecutionrelation memorystream[_1#2,_2#3], [_1#2, _2#3]    @ org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.unsupportedoperationchecker$.org$apache$spark$sql$catalyst$analysis$unsupportedoperationchecker$$throwerror(unsupportedoperationchecker.scala:297)   @ org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.unsupportedoperationchecker$.checkforstreaming(unsupportedoperationchecker.scala:115)   @ org.apache.spark.sql.streaming.streamingquerymanager.createquery(streamingquerymanager.scala:232)   @ org.apache.spark.sql.streaming.streamingquerymanager.startquery(streamingquerymanager.scala:278)   @ org.apache.spark.sql.streaming.datastreamwriter.start(datastreamwriter.scala:247)   ... 57 elided

from structured streaming programming guide - other queries (excluding aggregations, mapgroupswithstate , flatmapgroupswithstate):

complete mode not supported infeasible keep unaggregated data in result table.

to answer question:

what happen if spark allowed complete output mode no aggregations in streaming query?

probably oom.

the puzzling part why dropduplicates("id") not marked aggregation.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer
Read more

jquery - Responsive Navbar with Sub Navbar -

good day, forgive me nav vocabulary not best. if question confusing apologize. i'm working on navigation bar needs centered on page @ 768px , above. items in nav open (or perhaps toggle) subnav lives directly below. these nav should appear centered on page. i have been able work through responsive portion of nav bar, having main items align vertically , sub nav menu of each item roll out below, , gave them indent separation. working well. however, issue not responsive side, behavior @ width greater 768px. happens toggling menu's sub navigation pushes other main items down page below sub nav. here's code: $(document).ready(function () { //stick in fixed 100% height behind navbar don't wrap $('#slide-nav.navbar-inverse').after($('<div class="inverse" id="navbar-height-col"></div>')); $('#slide-nav.navbar-default').after($('<div id="navbar-height-col"></d
Read more