java - Apache Camel: asyncCallback reply threads change in Camel 17 and Camel 18/19 -


with camel version 17.x calls on synchroniztion.oncomplete() callback on 'activemq:queue' done in different threads , if processing of response inside oncomplete slow messages did not got blocked , queued. should result of asyncconsumer=true&defaulttaskexecutortype=threadpool&concurrentconsumers=2&maxconcurrentconsumers=100 configuration understand. example output showcase :

received async reply: 2000 ok received async reply: 3000 ok received async reply: 5000 ok received async reply: 9000 ok received async reply: 10000 ok finished async reply: 2000 ok finished async reply: 3000 ok finished async reply: 5000 ok finished async reply: 9000 ok finished async reply: 10000 ok

so "finished" logs after "received" each called in different thread. replies received async , how long 1 handled doesn't affect receiving of others.

after upgrading camel 18.x (or 19.x) no longer same. , receiving reply , handling (long process) blocks receiving of others. because same thread(s) used call synchroniztion.oncomplete() replies queued until handled.

received async reply: 2000 ok received async reply: 10000 ok received async reply: 9000 ok finished async reply: 2000 ok received async reply: 3000 ok finished async reply: 3000 ok finished async reply: 9000 ok finished async reply: 10000 ok received async reply: 5000 ok finished async reply: 5000 ok

i thought these new properties configure this: replytoconcurrentconsumers=2&replytomaxconcurrentconsumers=100 , if new message comes processed , replied in new thread if current threads processing right (and of course if max count not reached it's normal thread process several messages , queue them)

maybe wrong how configure route similar result in camel 17. increasing replytoconcurrentconsumers property works think should scaled dynamically , rely on replytomaxconcurrentconsumers if needed.

the code :

public class asynccallbacktest {  private static final logger log = loggerfactory.getlogger(asynccallbacktest.class);  public static void main(string[] args) throws exception {     // create , setup default camel context     final camelcontext camelcontext = new defaultcamelcontext();     setuproutes(camelcontext);     camelcontext.start();      // real test     asynccallbacktest(camelcontext);      camelcontext.stop();     system.exit(0); }  private static void setuproutes(camelcontext camelcontext) throws exception {     camelcontext.addroutes(new routebuilder() {         public void configure() {             from("activemq://queue:asynctest?asyncconsumer=true&defaulttaskexecutortype=threadpool" +                     "&concurrentconsumers=2&maxconcurrentconsumers=100")                     .process(exchange -> {                         final string msg = string.valueof(exchange.getin().getbody());                         exchange.getout().setbody(msg + " ok");                     });         }     }); }  private static void asynccallbacktest(camelcontext camelcontext) throws exception {     final int[] delays = new int[]{9000, 10000, 5000, 2000, 3000};      final countdownlatch countdownlatch = new countdownlatch(delays.length);      final synchronization callback = new synchronizationadapter() {         @override         public void oncomplete(exchange exchange) {             log.info("received async reply: " + exchange.getout().getbody());             final int delay = (int) exchange.getin().getbody();             synchronized (this) {                 try {                     this.wait(delay);                 } catch (interruptedexception e) {                     e.printstacktrace();                 }             }             log.info("finished async reply: " + exchange.getout().getbody());              super.oncomplete(exchange);         }          @override         public void ondone(exchange exchange) {             countdownlatch.countdown();         }     };      final producertemplate producertemplate = camelcontext.createproducertemplate();      (int = 0; < delays.length; i++) {         final exchange exchange = new defaultexchange(camelcontext);         exchange.getin().setbody(delays[i]);         exchange.setpattern(exchangepattern.inout);          producertemplate.asynccallback("activemq://queue:asynctest?" +                         "replytoconcurrentconsumers=2&replytomaxconcurrentconsumers=100",                 exchange, callback);     }      countdownlatch.await();     camelcontext.stop();  }

}


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj...
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer ...
Read more

c# - Asp.net web api : redirect unauthorized requst to forbidden page -

im trying redirect unauthorized request forbidden page instead i'm getting forbidden page in response body , how can fix ? here's startup class : app.createperowincontext(storecontext.create); app.createperowincontext<applicationusermanager>(applicationusermanager.create); app.createperowincontext<applicationsigninmanager>(applicationsigninmanager.create); app.usecookieauthentication(new cookieauthenticationoptions { authenticationtype = defaultauthenticationtypes.applicationcookie, expiretimespan = timespan.fromdays(30), }); app.useexternalsignincookie(defaultauthenticationtypes.externalcookie); app.usetwofactorsignincookie(defaultauthenticationtypes.twofactorcookie, timespan.fromminutes(5)); app.usetwofactorrememberbrowsercookie(defaultauthenticationtypes.twofactorrememberbrowsercookie); the method im trying reach : [httpget] [authorize(roles = "admin")] public string getcurrentusername() { return userman...
Read more