scala - Avro Serialization from generics -


this simple example based on github page of avro4s, , works fine.

object main extends app {    case class ingredient(name: string, sugar: double, fat: double)   case class pizza(name: string, ingredients: seq[ingredient], vegetarian: boolean, vegan: boolean, calories: int)    val pepperoni = pizza("pepperoni", seq(ingredient("pepperoni", 12, 4.4), ingredient("onions", 1, 0.4)), false, false, 98)   val hawaiian = pizza("hawaiian", seq(ingredient("ham", 1.5, 5.6), ingredient("pineapple", 5.2, 0.2)), false, false, 91)    val format = recordformat[pizza]   val recordinavro = format.to(pepperoni)   printf(s"avro of pepperoni: $recordinavro\n") }

but this:

object main extends app {    case class ingredient(name: string, sugar: double, fat: double)   case class pizza(name: string, ingredients: seq[ingredient], vegetarian: boolean, vegan: boolean, calories: int)    val pepperoni = pizza("pepperoni", seq(ingredient("pepperoni", 12, 4.4), ingredient("onions", 1, 0.4)), false, false, 98)   val hawaiian = pizza("hawaiian", seq(ingredient("ham", 1.5, 5.6), ingredient("pineapple", 5.2, 0.2)), false, false, 91)    def toavro[t](obj: t): genericrecord = recordformat[t].to(obj)    val recordinavro = toavro[pizza](pepperoni)   printf(s"avro of pepperoni: $recordinavro\n") }

however, though last piece of code seems fine, following error during compilation time:

error:(14, 54) not find implicit value parameter torecord: com.sksamuel.avro4s.torecord[t]   def toavro[t](obj: t): genericrecord = recordformat[t].to(obj) error:(14, 54) not enough arguments method apply: (implicit torecord: com.sksamuel.avro4s.torecord[t], implicit fromrecord: com.sksamuel.avro4s.fromrecord[t])com.sksamuel.avro4s.recordformat[t] in object recordformat. unspecified value parameters torecord, fromrecord.   def toavro[t](obj: t): genericrecord = recordformat[t].to(obj)

any tips on how make avro serialisation work generics? thank you.

try change definition to

def toavro[t: torecord: fromrecord](obj: t): genericrecord = recordformat[t].to(obj)

more info here , here

in nutshell: when using concrete type compiler automatically find required torecord implicit value. in parameterized code should promise compiler supply implicit value somehow.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer
Read more

jquery - Responsive Navbar with Sub Navbar -

good day, forgive me nav vocabulary not best. if question confusing apologize. i'm working on navigation bar needs centered on page @ 768px , above. items in nav open (or perhaps toggle) subnav lives directly below. these nav should appear centered on page. i have been able work through responsive portion of nav bar, having main items align vertically , sub nav menu of each item roll out below, , gave them indent separation. working well. however, issue not responsive side, behavior @ width greater 768px. happens toggling menu's sub navigation pushes other main items down page below sub nav. here's code: $(document).ready(function () { //stick in fixed 100% height behind navbar don't wrap $('#slide-nav.navbar-inverse').after($('<div class="inverse" id="navbar-height-col"></div>')); $('#slide-nav.navbar-default').after($('<div id="navbar-height-col"></d
Read more