c++ - Warning C4267 'argument': conversion from 'size_t' to 'DWORD', possible loss of data -


i migrating code 32bit vs2012 64bit vs2015.

i encountered following function call in program:

crypthashdata(hhash,                  (byte*)auth_encryption_key,                     wcslen(auth_encryption_key) * sizeof(wchar_t),                     0u))

whose declaration in wincrypt.h located in c:\program files (x86)\windows kits\8.0\include\um\wincrypt.h (looks not edited).

the declaration is:

winadvapi bool winapi crypthashdata( _in_                    hcrypthash  hhash, _in_reads_bytes_(dwdatalen)  const byte  *pbdata, _in_                    dword   dwdatalen, _in_                    dword   dwflags );

dword dwflags: problem here 0u unsigned int , function needs dword.

to solve error did:

  • c-style casting (dword)(0u) in function call(tried size_t, unsigned int)
  • static_cast
  • tried creating new variable , casted it

but warning still persists

looks have change in function call

can suggest me how solve issue.

please ask if more details required.

warning image details
later warning image details

you thinking of 0u being problem.
me looks problem should around third parameter, size_t value used feed dword parameter.

as someprogrammerdude has explained, size_t 64bit in new environment, while dword 32bit. explains mismatch on new platform.

on 32bit platform did not warning (i assume), because size_t 32bit there, without risk of loosing information.

you reported casting avoids warning, indicates 0u not problem.
fact warning seems on line 0u caused compiler complaining whole function call , pin pointing end of it, i.e. closing ), happens on same line 0u.
experiment of moving ) separate lines (result visible difference bwetween 2 screenshots) has confirmed this.

note casting avoided warning, not same solving problem.
(you wisely asked safety of casting, recommend in separate question.)


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj...
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer ...
Read more

c# - Asp.net web api : redirect unauthorized requst to forbidden page -

im trying redirect unauthorized request forbidden page instead i'm getting forbidden page in response body , how can fix ? here's startup class : app.createperowincontext(storecontext.create); app.createperowincontext<applicationusermanager>(applicationusermanager.create); app.createperowincontext<applicationsigninmanager>(applicationsigninmanager.create); app.usecookieauthentication(new cookieauthenticationoptions { authenticationtype = defaultauthenticationtypes.applicationcookie, expiretimespan = timespan.fromdays(30), }); app.useexternalsignincookie(defaultauthenticationtypes.externalcookie); app.usetwofactorsignincookie(defaultauthenticationtypes.twofactorcookie, timespan.fromminutes(5)); app.usetwofactorrememberbrowsercookie(defaultauthenticationtypes.twofactorrememberbrowsercookie); the method im trying reach : [httpget] [authorize(roles = "admin")] public string getcurrentusername() { return userman...
Read more