executorservice - How is an executor terminated in my Java program? -


this question related previous question : why speed of java process inside multiple loops slows down goes?

in order find problem of question, looked closely @ code , found executors in app not terminated, since i'm in process of learning how use executors, copied online sample codes , used them in app, , i'm not sure if i'm using them correctly.

what's difference between following 2 approaches of using executors ?

[1]

 executor executor=executors.newfixedthreadpool(30);  countdownlatch donesignal=new countdownlatch(280);   (int n=0;n<280;n++)  {    ...    executor.execute(new samplecountrunner(donesignal,...));  }  try { donesignal.await(); }  catch (exception e) { e.printstacktrace(); }

[2]

executorservice executor=executors.newfixedthreadpool(30);  (int i=0;i<60;i++) {   ...   executor.execute(new xyzrunner(...)); } executor.shutdown();  while (!executor.isterminated()) { }

it seems me after 1st 1 done, executor still has active pool of threads running , waiting more tasks, consume cpu time , memory.

the 2nd 1 terminate active threads in pool after shutdown() method run, , active threads won't take more cpu time or memory after point.

so questions :

[1] correct ?

[2] how terminate pool of threads in 1st case ? there no "executor.shutdown()" executor

edit :

problem solved, changed executor in [1] executorservice, , added :

   executor.shutdown();    while (!executor.isterminated()) { }

now when program ends, won't have lot of threads active more.

it seems me after 1st 1 done, executor still has active pool of threads running , waiting more tasks, consume cpu time , memory.

not exactly. in first approach , after tasks done ( signalled latch ) , executor not shutdown - threads in executor not consume cpu ( consume minimum memory needed thier structures yes ).

in approach - explicitly in control of knowing when , how tasks completed. can know if tasks have succeeded or failed , , can decide resubmit tasks if needed.

the 2nd 1 terminate active threads in pool after shutdown() method run, , active threads won't take more cpu time or memory after point.

again ,not .in approach , executorservice not shutdown after call shutdown(). waits submitted tasks complete , here not directly know if these tasks completed or failed ( throwing exception ).

and until submitted tasks completed - isshutdown() tight loop ( spike cpu near 100% ) .


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer
Read more

jquery - Responsive Navbar with Sub Navbar -

good day, forgive me nav vocabulary not best. if question confusing apologize. i'm working on navigation bar needs centered on page @ 768px , above. items in nav open (or perhaps toggle) subnav lives directly below. these nav should appear centered on page. i have been able work through responsive portion of nav bar, having main items align vertically , sub nav menu of each item roll out below, , gave them indent separation. working well. however, issue not responsive side, behavior @ width greater 768px. happens toggling menu's sub navigation pushes other main items down page below sub nav. here's code: $(document).ready(function () { //stick in fixed 100% height behind navbar don't wrap $('#slide-nav.navbar-inverse').after($('<div class="inverse" id="navbar-height-col"></div>')); $('#slide-nav.navbar-default').after($('<div id="navbar-height-col"></d
Read more