Android O background execution limits not fully applied with bounded and started service -


my sample app uses targetsdkversion 26.

i have simple service, both started , bounded following code snippet:

val intent = boundservicetest.buildintent(applicationcontext) applicationcontext.startservice(intent) applicationcontext.bindservice(intent, serviceconnection, bind_auto_create)

please aware use global application context binding, not activity context.

the service imlements basic logging:

class boundservicetest : service() {    companion object {     private val tag = "boundservicetest"      fun buildintent(context: context): intent {         return intent(context, boundservicetest::class.java)     }   }    private val binder = binder()    override fun onbind(p0: intent?): ibinder {     log.d(tag, "onbind")     return binder   }    override fun onunbind(intent: intent?): boolean {     log.d(tag, "onunbind")     return super.onunbind(intent)   }    override fun oncreate() {     super.oncreate()     log.d(tag, "oncreate")   }    override fun onstartcommand(intent: intent?, flags: int, startid: int): int {     log.d(tag, "onstartcommand: startid = " + startid)     return start_sticky   }    override fun ondestroy() {     log.d(tag, "ondestroy")     super.ondestroy()   }  }

basically not sure, if android o applies background execution limits or not, since documentation states (background service limitations):

bound services not affected

these rules not affect bound services in way. if app defines bound service, other components can bind service whether or not app in foreground.

but seems os isn't quite sure regarding logcat:

de.continental.android.androidoservicetest d/boundservicetest: oncreate de.continental.android.androidoservicetest d/boundservicetest: onstartcommand: startid = 1 de.continental.android.androidoservicetest d/boundservicetest: onbind ? w/activitymanager: stopping service due app idle: u0a141 -1m9s733ms de.continental.android.androidoservicetest/.boundservicetest i/runningstate: unknown non-service process: de.continental.android.androidoservicetest #14943 i/chatty: uid=1000(system) runningstate:ba identical 1 line i/runningstate: unknown non-service process: de.continental.android.androidoservicetest #14943

the activitymanager log message indicates service shall stopped (regardless bound one), os doesn't stop service: log messages calling ondestroy method not displayed, compared simple started service without binding.

how scenario (started , bound service) handled in android o? or encounter bug?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer
Read more

jquery - Responsive Navbar with Sub Navbar -

good day, forgive me nav vocabulary not best. if question confusing apologize. i'm working on navigation bar needs centered on page @ 768px , above. items in nav open (or perhaps toggle) subnav lives directly below. these nav should appear centered on page. i have been able work through responsive portion of nav bar, having main items align vertically , sub nav menu of each item roll out below, , gave them indent separation. working well. however, issue not responsive side, behavior @ width greater 768px. happens toggling menu's sub navigation pushes other main items down page below sub nav. here's code: $(document).ready(function () { //stick in fixed 100% height behind navbar don't wrap $('#slide-nav.navbar-inverse').after($('<div class="inverse" id="navbar-height-col"></div>')); $('#slide-nav.navbar-default').after($('<div id="navbar-height-col"></d
Read more