c++ - Defining a variadic template type with unknown argument list as std::map value type -


i not sure if possible @ trying achieve past 3 hours without sense-making approach.

i have variadic template this:

template<typename... ts> class xunit_test_item { public:     template<typename f, typename... args>     xunit_test_item(const std::string& name, f&& func, args&&... args)     : m_name(name)     , m_f(std::forward<f>(func))     , m_args(std::forward<args>(args)...)     {     }      // ...  private:     const std::string m_name;     std::function<void (ts...) > m_f;     std::tuple<ts...> m_args; };

above template wraps test item holder of functor passed arguments along string name item.

objects of type have stored std::map value type. handled in class contains std::map container member, registration method add xunit_test_item items , run method, iterates on map , executes stored xunit_test_item stored functions.

the class looks this:

class unit_test {      // define map type of xunit_test_items     template<typename ...ts>     using testitem_map_t = std::map<size_t, xunit_test_item<ts...>>;  public:     unit_test() = delete;     unit_test(const std::string& group_name)     : m_tm()     , m_group_name(group_name)     , m_test_id(0)     {      }     // register functor item     template<typename f, typename ...args>     void add_test(const std::string& name, f&& fun, args&& ...args) {         m_tm.emplace(++m_test_id, xunit_test_item<args...>(             name, std::forward<f>(fun), std::forward<args>(args)...));     }      void run()      {         // ...          (auto& t : m_tm) {             // ...             t.second->run();             // ...         }     }  private:     testitem_map_t m_tm; // <-- compiler correctly reports error     std::string m_group_name;     size_t m_test_id; };

the problem have find right syntax / different approach define xunit_test_item value type of m_tm map member. above code not compiling - without doubt - have specify argument list m_tm member type testitem_map_t. have no idea how define type , declare correctly m_tm member. argument list unknown @ point. perhaps above classes have design issue, wonder if there more or less simple way achieve this. may fail see simple solution.

would happy learn , suggestion. in advance!

update

fresh day, fresh try , cup of coffee ...

i refactored body of add_test method using 2-level lambda , seems work far. test functions (the actual test cases) can add lambdas, function pointers arbitrary or no arguments @ all.

i don't know if best solution, or if can coded in better way, maybe wants comment on topic. reason why not enter answer. hope initial question maybe learn c++14 sugar solution ... if possible.

this first tested version ...

template<typename f, typename ...args> void add_test(const std::string& name, f&& fun, args&& ...args) {     std::function<void(args...)> fun_xargs =         [name, fun](auto&&... args) {             std::cout << "  inner lambda\n";             auto x = xunit_test_item<args...>(name, fun, std::forward<args>(args)...);             x.run();         };      std::function<void()> fun_void =          [=] {             std::cout << "outer lambda\n";             fun_xargs(args...);         };      m_tm.emplace(++m_test_id, fun_void); }

it seems need:

class unit_test { public:     unit_test() = delete;     unit_test(const std::string& group_name)     : m_tm(), m_group_name(group_name)     {      }      // register functor item     void add_test(const std::string& name, std::function<void()> f) {         m_tm.emplace(name, std::move(f));     }      void run()      {         // ...         (const auto& t : m_tm) {             // ...             t.second->run();             // ...         }     }  private:     std::map<std::string, std::function<void()>> m_tm;     std::string m_group_name; };

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj...
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer ...
Read more

c# - Asp.net web api : redirect unauthorized requst to forbidden page -

im trying redirect unauthorized request forbidden page instead i'm getting forbidden page in response body , how can fix ? here's startup class : app.createperowincontext(storecontext.create); app.createperowincontext<applicationusermanager>(applicationusermanager.create); app.createperowincontext<applicationsigninmanager>(applicationsigninmanager.create); app.usecookieauthentication(new cookieauthenticationoptions { authenticationtype = defaultauthenticationtypes.applicationcookie, expiretimespan = timespan.fromdays(30), }); app.useexternalsignincookie(defaultauthenticationtypes.externalcookie); app.usetwofactorsignincookie(defaultauthenticationtypes.twofactorcookie, timespan.fromminutes(5)); app.usetwofactorrememberbrowsercookie(defaultauthenticationtypes.twofactorrememberbrowsercookie); the method im trying reach : [httpget] [authorize(roles = "admin")] public string getcurrentusername() { return userman...
Read more