database - SQL design for similar tables with few column differences -


i working on application deals questions , answers. answers can of different types ranging int, text, image, option, etc.. , wonder if practice separate different tables below?

question            questionanswer --------            ------------- int id               int questionid int typeid           int answerid  textanswer          imageanswer    optionanswer        intanswer ----------          -----------    ------------        --------- int answerid        int answerid   int answerid        int answerid nvarchar value      binary value   int value           int value                                    int optiontypeid

i thought aggregating 1 single answer table filled nullable fields , afraid might introduce bugs if not careful. idea or design practice in separating different types of answers? or perhaps there better approach ? thanks!

the question of 1 table (for answers), 4 tables (for each type of answer), or 5 tables (one answers, 1 specific each type) depends on 2 factors.

the important is: how data used? second is: database using?

let me dispense second part first. databases (notably postgres) have built-in support table inheritance. can read [documentation]; 1; want.

for other databases how choose? well, have table answerid in it. suggests want single entity, automatically generated primary key.

so, store information in table or not? 1 argument of putting columns in single table simplicity: data in 1 place. can enforce null-ness of values using check constraints. 1 downside adding new type requires modifying table.

another alternative have each of specific tables. can use answerid primary key, having foreign key answers. makes each add new types. however, can cumbersome ensure answer has 1 type. joins bit more complicated.

under circumstances, tend go 1 table , proliferation of columns, if knew expected range of types in advance.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj...
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer ...
Read more

c# - Asp.net web api : redirect unauthorized requst to forbidden page -

im trying redirect unauthorized request forbidden page instead i'm getting forbidden page in response body , how can fix ? here's startup class : app.createperowincontext(storecontext.create); app.createperowincontext<applicationusermanager>(applicationusermanager.create); app.createperowincontext<applicationsigninmanager>(applicationsigninmanager.create); app.usecookieauthentication(new cookieauthenticationoptions { authenticationtype = defaultauthenticationtypes.applicationcookie, expiretimespan = timespan.fromdays(30), }); app.useexternalsignincookie(defaultauthenticationtypes.externalcookie); app.usetwofactorsignincookie(defaultauthenticationtypes.twofactorcookie, timespan.fromminutes(5)); app.usetwofactorrememberbrowsercookie(defaultauthenticationtypes.twofactorrememberbrowsercookie); the method im trying reach : [httpget] [authorize(roles = "admin")] public string getcurrentusername() { return userman...
Read more