java - Does every static factory methods internally uses new keyword to create object? -


i checked following commonly used static factory methods , each 1 of them internally uses new keyword create object

  1. valueof()

     public static string more ...valueof(char c) {      char data[] = {c};      return new string(data, true);  }   public static string more ...valueof(int i) {      return integer.tostring(i);  }

  2. tostring() returns return new string(buf, true);

    source: java.lang.string.java

part 2 of relevant source: getinstance()

public static calendar more ...getinstance() {     calendar cal = createcalendar(timezone.getdefaultref(),      locale.getdefault(locale.category.format));     cal.sharedzone = true;     return cal; }

createcalendar method internally creates calendar object using new keyword.

source: java.util.calendar.java

is there static factory method, internally not create object using new keyword?

you have 3 ways :

1) factory types instantiate known @ compile time use new operator.
best way straight , compiler enforces validity of object creation.

2) in particular cases, types instantiate may not known @ compile time.
in case, reflection unavoidable.
relies on class.forname() retrieve class , class.newinstance() method instantiate class.

look example java.net.inetaddress class.
has loadimpl() factory method works in way.
can see class.forname() , class.newinstance() methods may throw "technical" exceptions , these discovered @ runtime.

static inetaddressimpl loadimpl(string implname) {     object impl = null;      /*      * property "impl.prefix" prepended classname      * of implementation object instantiate,      * delegate real work (like native methods).       * property can vary across implementations of java.      * classes.  default empty string "".      */     string prefix = accesscontroller.doprivileged(                   new getpropertyaction("impl.prefix", ""));     try {         impl = class.forname("java.net." + prefix + implname).newinstance();     } catch (classnotfoundexception e) {         system.err.println("class not found: java.net." + prefix +                            implname + ":\ncheck impl.prefix property " +                            "in properties file.");     } catch (instantiationexception e) {         system.err.println("could not instantiate: java.net." + prefix +                            implname + ":\ncheck impl.prefix property " +                            "in properties file.");     } catch (illegalaccessexception e) {         system.err.println("cannot access class: java.net." + prefix +                            implname + ":\ncheck impl.prefix property " +                            "in properties file.");     }      if (impl == null) {         try {             impl = class.forname(implname).newinstance();         } catch (exception e) {             throw new error("system property impl.prefix incorrect");         }     }      return (inetaddressimpl) impl; }

3) sometimes, created object new or newinstance() may cached avoid creating multiple times same object.
may make sense immutable objects.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer
Read more

jquery - Responsive Navbar with Sub Navbar -

good day, forgive me nav vocabulary not best. if question confusing apologize. i'm working on navigation bar needs centered on page @ 768px , above. items in nav open (or perhaps toggle) subnav lives directly below. these nav should appear centered on page. i have been able work through responsive portion of nav bar, having main items align vertically , sub nav menu of each item roll out below, , gave them indent separation. working well. however, issue not responsive side, behavior @ width greater 768px. happens toggling menu's sub navigation pushes other main items down page below sub nav. here's code: $(document).ready(function () { //stick in fixed 100% height behind navbar don't wrap $('#slide-nav.navbar-inverse').after($('<div class="inverse" id="navbar-height-col"></div>')); $('#slide-nav.navbar-default').after($('<div id="navbar-height-col"></d
Read more