java - Jackson 2.8.9 @JsonPropertyOrder does not arrange field that is generated by @JsonTypeInfo when serializing XML -


i trying serialize , deserialize xml in following format:

<home>     <handle>300023</handle>     <command>login</command>     <content>         <user_id>300023</user_id>         <result>0</result>     </content> </home>

and try map following classes:

@data @jacksonxmlrootelement(localname = "home") @jsonpropertyorder({"handle", "command", "content"}) public class home {      private long handle;      @jsontypeinfo(       use = jsontypeinfo.id.name,       include = jsontypeinfo.as.external_property,       visible = true,       property = "command")     @jsonsubtypes({         @jsonsubtypes.type(value = logincontent.class, name = "login")     })     private basecontent content; }

and

@data @jsonpropertyorder({     "user_id",     "result"}) public class logincontent implements basecontent{      @jacksonxmlproperty(localname = "user_id")     private long userid;     private int result; }

the problem occurs when serialize with

home home = new home(); home.sethandle(300023); logincontent content = new logincontent(); content.setuserid(300023); content.setresult(0); home.setcontent(content); xmlmapper xmlmapper = new xmlmapper(); xmlmapper.findandregistermodules(); string xmlstring = xmlmapper.writevalueasstring(home);

xmlstring return xml correct fields incorrect order @jsonpropertyorder

<home>     <handle>300023</handle>     <content>         <user_id>300023</user_id>         <result>0</result>     </content>     <command>login</command> </home>

the implementing class type of content based on value of <command>, in same level <content>, hence usage of jsontypeinfo.as.external_property. since deserialization working expected, excluded other implementing classes of basecontent. looking way can make @jsonpropertyorder effective fields generated @jsontypeinfo. have tried add command field in home.class, result in duplicated tag in xml.

what correct way achieve this? or there other better way of doing (serialize , deserialize mentioned xml content varies based on command value specific order)?

thanks in advance.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer
Read more

jquery - Responsive Navbar with Sub Navbar -

good day, forgive me nav vocabulary not best. if question confusing apologize. i'm working on navigation bar needs centered on page @ 768px , above. items in nav open (or perhaps toggle) subnav lives directly below. these nav should appear centered on page. i have been able work through responsive portion of nav bar, having main items align vertically , sub nav menu of each item roll out below, , gave them indent separation. working well. however, issue not responsive side, behavior @ width greater 768px. happens toggling menu's sub navigation pushes other main items down page below sub nav. here's code: $(document).ready(function () { //stick in fixed 100% height behind navbar don't wrap $('#slide-nav.navbar-inverse').after($('<div class="inverse" id="navbar-height-col"></div>')); $('#slide-nav.navbar-default').after($('<div id="navbar-height-col"></d
Read more