macros - How do I create this case statements in proc sql and append when tables are overwritten? -


i have spent several months data mining , creating technique find out information company. having trouble putting data appropriate , valuable presentation on how summarize information in sas. have 3 questions.

1)how in proc sql " if matched_by_t2 > b2_c2 add in new column "no bueno"

2)is there way have "(bc_c2/ original_count) %" how insert percent sign

3) if run query multiple times list of datasets how new tables named same "e_data_unmatched" append each time new table created , overwritten in imgur show 2 rows each timie program runs tables overwritten want ensure each time loop runs new records append table rather overwrite. 1 http://imgur.com/bzlefxy

thank you!

    proc sql; create table wanted select t1.occurences original_count       ,t2.occurences matched_by_t1       ,t3.occurences matched_by_t2       ,t2.occurences+t3.occurences b2_c2       ,t4.occurences not_matched       ,t5.occurences matched_by_t2 (select count(*) occurences query_for_reports1) t1     ,(select count(*) occurences query_for_reports1 edsys not null) t2     ,(select count(*) occurences e_data_unmatched ip not null) t3     ,(select count(*) occurences work.e_dat_unmatched ips= .) t4     ,(select count(*) occurences work.append_table13) t5 ; quit; 

1) add new column "no bueno" in sql set value based on conditiong " if matched_by_t2 > b2_c2"  2) concatenate percentage sign  proc sql; create table wanted select t1.occurences original_count       ,t2.occurences matched_by_t1       ,t3.occurences matched_by_t2       ,t2.occurences+t3.occurences b2_c2       ,t4.occurences not_matched       ,t5.occurences matched_by_t2, case when t3.occurences> t5.occurences 0  else 1 end no_bueno,  cast(((t2.occurences+t3.occurences)/ t1.occurences) nvarchar(5)) +'%' (select count(*) occurences query_for_reports1) t1     ,(select count(*) occurences query_for_reports1 edsys not null) t2     ,(select count(*) occurences e_data_unmatched ip not null) t3     ,(select count(*) occurences work.e_dat_unmatched ips= .) t4     ,(select count(*) occurences work.append_table13) t5 ; quit;

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer
Read more

jquery - Responsive Navbar with Sub Navbar -

good day, forgive me nav vocabulary not best. if question confusing apologize. i'm working on navigation bar needs centered on page @ 768px , above. items in nav open (or perhaps toggle) subnav lives directly below. these nav should appear centered on page. i have been able work through responsive portion of nav bar, having main items align vertically , sub nav menu of each item roll out below, , gave them indent separation. working well. however, issue not responsive side, behavior @ width greater 768px. happens toggling menu's sub navigation pushes other main items down page below sub nav. here's code: $(document).ready(function () { //stick in fixed 100% height behind navbar don't wrap $('#slide-nav.navbar-inverse').after($('<div class="inverse" id="navbar-height-col"></div>')); $('#slide-nav.navbar-default').after($('<div id="navbar-height-col"></d
Read more