merge - How to get total production lost from Startdate to enddate for continous days -


basically idea identify down time start date end date continuous days , lost production.

i have data 

completiondwid|completionmerrickid|downtimedescription|lostproduction|startdate|enddate  1456|2221|producer:  shut in buildup|0.474951166666667|2016-12-28 00:00:00.000|2016-12-28 00:00:00.000  1456|2221|producer:  shut in buildup|0.474951166666667|2016-12-29 00:00:00.000|2016-12-29 00:00:00.000  1456|2221|producer:  shut in buildup|0.474951166666667|2016-12-30 00:00:00.000|2016-12-30 00:00:00.000  1456|2221|producer:  shut in buildup|0.474951166666667|2016-12-31 00:00:00.000|2016-12-31 00:00:00.000  1456|2221|producer:  shut in buildup|0.17691346       |2017-01-09 00:00:00.000|2017-01-09 00:00:00.000  1456|2221|producer:  shut in buildup|0.17691346       |2017-01-10 00:00:00.000|2017-01-10 00:00:00.000  1456|2221|producer:  shut in buildup|0.17691346       |2017-01-11 00:00:00.000|2017-01-11 00:00:00.000  1456|2221|producer:  shut in buildup|0.17691346       |2017-01-12 00:00:00.000|2017-01-12 00:00:00.000  1456|2221|producer:  shut in buildup|0.17691346       |2017-01-13 00:00:00.000|2017-01-13 00:00:00.000  1456|2221|producer:  shut in buildup|0.17691346       |2017-01-14 00:00:00.000|2017-01-14 00:00:00.000  1456|2221|producer:  shut in buildup|0.17691346       |2017-01-15 00:00:00.000|2017-01-15 00:00:00.000  1456|2221|producer:  shut in buildup|0.676294926666667|2017-06-23 00:00:00.000|2017-06-23 00:00:00.000  1456|2221|producer:  shut in buildup|0.51756477       |2017-06-24 00:00:00.000|2017-06-24 00:00:00.000  1456|2221|producer:  shut in buildup|0.40645366       |2017-06-25 00:00:00.000|2017-06-25 00:00:00.000

i want data below

completiondwid|completionmerrickid|downtimedescription|lostproduction|startdate|enddate 1456|2221|producer:  shut in buildup|1.899804667  |2016-12-28 00:00:00.000|2016-12-31 00:00:00.000  1456|2221|producer:  shut in buildup|1.23839422      |2017-01-09 00:00:00.000|2017-01-15 00:00:00.000  1456|2221|producer:  shut in buildup|1.600313357|2017-06-23 00:00:00.000|2017-06-25 00:00:00.000

i want achieve in sql server sql. value 1.899804667 summation of values date 2016-12-28 end date 2016-12-31. day 28 31 continuous days.

the value 1.600313357 summation of values date 2017-06-23 end date 2017-06-25. day 23 25 continuous days.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer
Read more

jquery - Responsive Navbar with Sub Navbar -

good day, forgive me nav vocabulary not best. if question confusing apologize. i'm working on navigation bar needs centered on page @ 768px , above. items in nav open (or perhaps toggle) subnav lives directly below. these nav should appear centered on page. i have been able work through responsive portion of nav bar, having main items align vertically , sub nav menu of each item roll out below, , gave them indent separation. working well. however, issue not responsive side, behavior @ width greater 768px. happens toggling menu's sub navigation pushes other main items down page below sub nav. here's code: $(document).ready(function () { //stick in fixed 100% height behind navbar don't wrap $('#slide-nav.navbar-inverse').after($('<div class="inverse" id="navbar-height-col"></div>')); $('#slide-nav.navbar-default').after($('<div id="navbar-height-col"></d
Read more