c++ - Alternative to virtual variables -


i have 2 classes, base , derived. derived inherits base , additionally includes several functions , variables -- therefore need have 2 separate classes. however, share 1 function, run.

in example below have pass argument run in order execute read - argument depends on class object refers to. possible write generic version of read such program automatically uses vars_base or vars_derived depending on object calls run?

#include <iostream> #include <fstream> #include <string> #include <vector>  class base {   protected:     void read(std::vector<std::string>);    public:     void run(std::vector<std::string> vars) { read(vars); }     std::vector<std::string> vars_base; };  void base::read(std::vector<std::string> int_vars) {     (auto int_vars_it : int_vars)     {         std::cout << int_vars_it << "\n";     } }  class derived : public base {   protected:   public:     std::vector<std::string> vars_derived;     ///here other functions known derived, not base };  int main() {     base b;     b.vars_base.push_back("ab");     b.vars_base.push_back("bb");     b.vars_base.push_back("cb");     b.run(b.vars_base);      derived d;     d.vars_derived.push_back("ad");     d.vars_derived.push_back("bd");     d.vars_derived.push_back("cd");     d.run(d.vars_derived);      return 0; }

is result want get?

class base { protected:     using vars_type = std::vector<std::string>;  private:     vars_type vars_base;  protected:     virtual vars_type& get_vars() {         return vars_base;     }  public:     void push_back(const std::string& str) {         get_vars().push_back(str);     }      void run()     {         (auto int_vars_it : get_vars()) {             std::cout << int_vars_it << " ";         }     } };  class derived : public base { private:     vars_type vars_derived;  protected:     vars_type& get_vars() override {         return vars_derived;     }  public:     ///here other functions known derived, not base };  int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {     base b;     b.push_back("ab");     b.push_back("bb");     b.push_back("cb");     b.run();    // prints ab bb cb      std::cout << std::endl;      derived d;     d.push_back("ad");     d.push_back("bd");     d.push_back("cd");     d.run();    // prints ad bd cd      return 0; }

if explanation next: there no such thing "virtual variable", there virtual functions. can use virtual functions "internal accessors" member variables. although, derived class contains both vars_base , vars_derived, get_vars() lets override access appropriate instance of vars.

hope you'll find helpful.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer
Read more

jquery - Responsive Navbar with Sub Navbar -

good day, forgive me nav vocabulary not best. if question confusing apologize. i'm working on navigation bar needs centered on page @ 768px , above. items in nav open (or perhaps toggle) subnav lives directly below. these nav should appear centered on page. i have been able work through responsive portion of nav bar, having main items align vertically , sub nav menu of each item roll out below, , gave them indent separation. working well. however, issue not responsive side, behavior @ width greater 768px. happens toggling menu's sub navigation pushes other main items down page below sub nav. here's code: $(document).ready(function () { //stick in fixed 100% height behind navbar don't wrap $('#slide-nav.navbar-inverse').after($('<div class="inverse" id="navbar-height-col"></div>')); $('#slide-nav.navbar-default').after($('<div id="navbar-height-col"></d
Read more