java - How to pass Object object in functional interface/lambda call -


so, have piece of code goes like

public static void printstuff(object[] stuffs, function<?, string> func) {     for(object stuff : stuffs) {         string stringstuff = func.apply(stuff);         system.out.println(stringstuff);         // or whatever, done string not relevant     }     // ...

this method called arrays of different types, , corresponding func value, example:

printstuff(arrayofclasses, (class<?> c) -> c.getsimplename()); printstuff(arrayofstrings, (string s) -> '"' + s + '"'); printstuff(arrayofobjects, o -> o.tostring());

so need stuffs object[], because first common superclass of different types amongst method's calls.

and on compilation, get:

myclass.java:6: error: incompatible types: object cannot converted cap#1         string stringstuff = func.apply(stuff);                                         ^   cap#1 fresh type-variable:     cap#1 extends object capture of ?

my guess javac rants parameter give function<?, string> call, type, object, not extend object.

so question is, how can pass object parameter function<?, string>?

i can change interface types <object, string>, breaks others calls (with class[], string[], etc) , imply losing pretty whole point of genericity, wouldn't it?

unless there way change stuffs type <? extends object>[], or generic type, , i'm pretty sure it's not possible.

thanks in advance, folks.

edit:

if change method generic one, i.e.:

public static <u> void printstuff(object[] stuffs, function<u, string> func) {

i still compilation error :

myclass.java:6: error: method apply in interface function<t,r> cannot applied given types;             string stringstuff = func.apply(stuff);                                      ^   required: u   found: object   reason: argument mismatch; object cannot converted u

one solution use:

public static <t> void printstuff(t[] stuffs, function<t, string> func) {     for(t stuff : stuffs) {         // ....

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer
Read more

jquery - Responsive Navbar with Sub Navbar -

good day, forgive me nav vocabulary not best. if question confusing apologize. i'm working on navigation bar needs centered on page @ 768px , above. items in nav open (or perhaps toggle) subnav lives directly below. these nav should appear centered on page. i have been able work through responsive portion of nav bar, having main items align vertically , sub nav menu of each item roll out below, , gave them indent separation. working well. however, issue not responsive side, behavior @ width greater 768px. happens toggling menu's sub navigation pushes other main items down page below sub nav. here's code: $(document).ready(function () { //stick in fixed 100% height behind navbar don't wrap $('#slide-nav.navbar-inverse').after($('<div class="inverse" id="navbar-height-col"></div>')); $('#slide-nav.navbar-default').after($('<div id="navbar-height-col"></d
Read more