docker - Dockerizing ambry -


hi im trying run ambry in docker

part of docker-compose.yml file: 

ambry:     build: resources/ambry

and dockerfile :

from alpine:latest  user root  run \   apk update && \   apk upgrade && \   apk add git && \   apk add bash && \   apk add openjdk8 && \   rm -rf /var/cache/apk/*  env java_home /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8-openjdk  workdir /tmp  cmd ["sh"]  run git clone https://github.com/linkedin/ambry.git  workdir ambry  run ./gradlew alljar  workdir target  cmd mkdir logs  cmd java -dlog4j.configuration=file:../config/log4j.properties -jar ambry.jar --serverpropsfilepath ../config/server.properties --hardwarelayoutfilepath ../config/hardwarelayout.json --partitionlayoutfilepath ../config/partitionlayout.json > logs/server.log &  cmd java -dlog4j.configuration=file:../config/log4j.properties -cp "*" com.github.ambry.frontend.ambryfrontendmain --serverpropsfilepath ../config/frontend.properties --hardwarelayoutfilepath ../config/hardwarelayout.json --partitionlayoutfilepath ../config/partitionlayout.json > logs/frontend.log &

i doing commands in shell , taken https://github.com/linkedin/ambry. , works fine docker on start exit..:

dockerized_ambry_1 exited code 0

any 1 know why exists ?

https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/builder/#cmd

there can 1 cmd instruction in dockerfile. if list more 1 cmd last cmd take effect.

looks cmd of yours runs "run java class com.github.ambry.frontend.ambryfrontendmain". launch background process (you specified &).

the container lifetime tied "launch background task", completes immediately. container exits immediately.

since container responsible launching two services (ambry.jar, com.github.ambry.frontend.ambryfrontendmain): want container lifetime tied both of those, , want sigterm sent container, elegantly shutdown both of those.

i recommend using init system start & end services. alpine linux typically uses openrc, iirc dockerized alpine linux not have init system, need find variant (or install yourself).

personally i've found it's non-trivial use init systems docker: common problem logs don't go container's stdout; until overcome that, can black box. luck!


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a better way to structure post methods in Class Based Views -

i'm using class based views in django , never specify url in ajax calls , omit action parameter in form because know these requests go through post method of class based view. notice view - profile page make many requests depending on user updating on page - post method become convoluted , if/else mess example: def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs): # handle user changing available date if request.post.get('availabledate') != none: self.updateavailabledate(request) return jsonresponse({'result':'success'}) if request.post.get('newprojectname') != none: creative_user = creativeuserprofile.objects.get(id = request.user.id) project = project.create_project(creative_user, request.post['newprojectname']) project.save() return jsonresponse({'projectid': project.id }) if request.post.get('projectimage') != none , request.files['file']: proj
Read more

performance - Why is XCHG reg, reg a 3 micro-op instruction on modern Intel architectures? -

i'm doing micro-optimization on performance critical part of code , came across sequence of instructions (in at&t syntax): add %rax, %rbx mov %rdx, %rax mov %rbx, %rdx i thought had use case xchg allow me shave instruction , write: add %rbx, %rax xchg %rax, %rdx however, dimay found agner fog's instruction tables , xchg 3 micro-op instruction 2 cycle latency on sandy bridge, ivy bridge, broadwell, haswell , skylake. 3 whole micro-ops , 2 cycles of latency! 3 micro-ops throws off 4-1-1-1 cadence , 2 cycle latency makes worse original in best case since last 2 instructions in original might execute in parallel. now... cpu might breaking instruction micro-ops equivalent to: mov %rax, %tmp mov %rdx, %rax mov %tmp, %rdx where tmp anonymous internal register , suppose last 2 micro-ops run in parallel latency 2 cycles. given register renaming occurs on these micro-architectures, though, doesn't make sense me done way. why wouldn't register renamer
Read more

jquery - Responsive Navbar with Sub Navbar -

good day, forgive me nav vocabulary not best. if question confusing apologize. i'm working on navigation bar needs centered on page @ 768px , above. items in nav open (or perhaps toggle) subnav lives directly below. these nav should appear centered on page. i have been able work through responsive portion of nav bar, having main items align vertically , sub nav menu of each item roll out below, , gave them indent separation. working well. however, issue not responsive side, behavior @ width greater 768px. happens toggling menu's sub navigation pushes other main items down page below sub nav. here's code: $(document).ready(function () { //stick in fixed 100% height behind navbar don't wrap $('#slide-nav.navbar-inverse').after($('<div class="inverse" id="navbar-height-col"></div>')); $('#slide-nav.navbar-default').after($('<div id="navbar-height-col"></d
Read more